|
Viewing 1 - 9 out of 9 Blogs.
Commentary-Analysis
Socialized America: Gluttonous Hogs Suckling At The Teat of Government Published on 12-28-2010 Email To Friend Print Version By: Michael Vail(Chief Editor of BLN)
www.vantagepointradio.com
mike@vantagepointradio.com “Human societies come under the influence of great tides of thought and appetite that run unseen deeply below the surface of society. After a while these powerful streams of opinion and desire move the whole social mass along with them without the individuals in the mass being aware of the direction in which they are going.†--John T. Flynn, The Road Ahead
My father did not give me much advice as a child, but he did tell me that nothing comes for free in this world, they all have strings attached. Sometimes we must learn our lessons the hard way and that is what experience is all about. We should learn from our mistakes and learn from history. I am by no means heartless and people who are suffering in this economy should be helped by their friends and neighbors. Yet there are so many narcissistic people absorbed in their own lives that they can step over someone dying on the street without care. Our government has no soul it is merely a machine that runs everything through the cost-benefit analysis filter. It has the power to give and at the same time take away everything you have. "In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: 'If you don't work you die.'" --Rudyard Kipling
Most Americans would never consider themselves or their country as socialist. In the same breath they are waiting for the 'social' security, disability, unemployment, welfare, woman infants and children checks. I am sure you will say that you paid into the system and expect a return. I will say that you got suckered into the system and you pray for a return. When the government is providing, there is nothing guaranteed. Look at the state of California, one of the most socialized states in the union is handing out IOU's for income tax returns and somehow you are to use these to pay for tangible goods. This is absolutely ludicrous!! “The British Fabian Socialist saw early the immense value of social reform for accustoming the citizens to looking to the State for the correction of all their ills. They saw that welfare agitation could be made the vehicle for importing Socialist ideas into the minds of the common man. Max Beer said: "There was no reason for Socialists to wait for the revolution. The realization of socialism had begun from the moment when the State became accessible to social reform ideas.†--John T. Flynn, The Road Ahead
Americans once were fiercely independent and would never consider running to the government to solve their problems. Today we are a sad lot of whinny cry babies looking for someone to hand out free pacifiers. Are we devoid of pride and lacking in spirit and ability? Americans today are easily offended, and with the drop of a hat will petition governmental officials to squelch someone else's free speech. How can you live with yourselves? I guess you don't notice all of this as most of you are in super consumption mode trying to keep up with your neighbors. “We will have something called “Xâ€, which is displacing the system of free enterprise, all over the world. If we do not yet know what to call it, we can at least describe its major characteristics. They include, in most countries:
1. A strong, centralized government.
2. An executive arm growing at the expense of the legislative and judicial arms. In some countries, power is consolidated in a dictator, issuing decrees.
3. The control of banking, credit and security exchanges by the government.
4. The underwriting of employment by the government, either through armaments or public works.
5. The underwriting of social security by the government - old-age pensions, mothers' pensions, unemployment insurance, and the like.
6. The underwriting of food, housing, and medical care, by the government.
7. The use of deficit spending to finance these underwritings.
8. The abandonment of gold in favor of managed currencies.
9. The control of foreign trade by the government.
10. The control of natural resources.
11. The control of energy sources.
12. The control of transportation.
13. The control of agricultural production.
14. The control of labor organizations.
15. The enlistment of young men and women in youth corps devoted to health, discipline, community service and ideologies consistent with those of the authorities.
16. Heavy taxation, with special emphasis on the estates and incomes of the rich.
17. Control of industry without ownership.
18. State control of communications and propaganda.†--Stuart Chase, The Road We Are Traveling
Even an animal knows their priorities as they are instinctive, common sense would suggest that we don't want to be at the mercy of glorified bureaucrats trying to bring about some Utopian pipe dream. They are well on their way as the governments around the globe have taken over private industries for the sake of stabilizing the economy. I don't believe in social welfare or corporate welfare. Either you are a pig at the trough or you are not. “Another project now under heavy pressure by the Socialist Planners is socialized medicine. It is, of course, not called socialized medicine, but health insurance. The plan came, ostensibly, out of the Federal Security Agency from Mr. Oscar R. Ewing, its head. It calls for an increase, with federal aid, of the number of hospitals, doctors and nurses and dentists, along with what he calls compulsory health insurance. This is a plan similar to the one now operating in Britain under its Socialist government. Under it all employers and their employees would be taxed at the payroll window, as in the case of old-age pensions and unemployment insurance, for medical care. The proponents of this scheme had the effrontery to call it "free medical care." Of course it is not. It will be paid for by taxes which will come out of everyone's pocket. This would mean, of course, that, as in England, the patient would choose his doctor, but the doctors would be paid by the government and would be under its general management. The system is now on trial in England. It is by every standard of judgment a ghastly failure.†--John T. Flynn, The Road Ahead
“These Englishmen believed that if socialism was to be brought to England it would have to be done gradually and not by violent revolutionary means. They decided they would make the attempt through political methods. They adopted the policy of the Roman general, Quintus Fabius, who held the only way to defeat Hannibal was to avoid a general engagement and by clever withdrawals lure him to battle in small sectors and defeat him in sections. Hence they called the movement the Fabian movement. Their strategy as well as their program became known as Fabian Socialism.â€--John T. Flynn, The Road Ahead Uncle Sam will be your god if this madness continues, from cradle to grave he will oversee and supervise your life and any private activities. If you aren't productive enough Uncle Sam may force you to do manual labor to keep receiving your monthly stipend. If you are lucky enough to get offered a job in the 'new economy' you may have to go through Homeland Security screening. Do you see where this is going? Government intrusion in our lives and business is at an all time high and they aren't stopping anytime soon. “Do you believe in emergency services like police, fire, paramedics, military? Emergency services are forms of socialism.
Do you believe in epidemic prevention infrastructures like sewers, garbage removal, water purification, etc? Public health strategies are forms of socialism.
Do you believe in the importance of transportation infrastructure, such as properly maintained roadways, public transportation, and air traffic control? Transportation infrastructure maintenance is a form of socialism.
Do you believe in insurance? Yes, even health insurance, and in fact all insurance, is a form of socialism. Why? Because it spreads costs evenly among everyone in an insurance category even though each individual uses uneven amounts of their health coverage.†--David Gruder
At this stage in our economy more and more Americans are looking for hand outs. With the massive deluge of legislation and regulations they are destroying any chances for real entrepreneurial opportunities. You need a license for this and zoning laws keeping you from doing that, then all roads lead to Uncle Sam. Uncle Sam plays favorites and allows certain businesses to create giant monopolies and while watching small businesses wither and die. Your Ole uncle is more than happy to put you on the dole because he has you under control. If Uncle Sam decides to pull the frayed safety net from underneath you, what do you have left? When charity is given from friend to friend, neighbor to neighbor it is a blessing. “Socialism is commonly defined as government ownership of the means of production. With the exception of a number of services that are viewed as natural monopolies, such as sewer and water supplies, socialism in the form of government ownership has never achieved prominence in the United States. Instead, governments here have relied on regulation as a way of obtaining the same goals that socialists claim to seek: efficiency, equality, and control of externalities. If this approach is socialism, then urban planning has represented creeping socialism since around 1920. But it has recently accelerated and is now running rather than creeping. Moreover, it has such a head start that lovers of freedom may not be able to halt it, much less turn it around.†--Randal O'Toole, Is Urban Planning “Creeping Socialismâ€
If you are enjoying your subsidies, public transportation, public education, and all that government gives then you are a socialist. Irregardless of your left/right politics socialism prevails. Liberals, Progressives, and Conservatives all want to give your money to someone else. Why are you giving it to them in the first place? It doesn't matter if your tax dollars go to the 'Octomom' or to General Motors it is still socialism. It is time to take a long look in the mirror and a long look at those who are exploiting you for personal gain, but please don't kill the messenger as the message is vital. – Michael Vail De Omnibus Dubitandum Everything is to be doubted
I am a free man in body and in spirit, and
I bow down to no one. Nor will I bow down to this illegitimate government that
tries to wrap us in chains against our will. I shall resist, with all my soul,
attempts to break my free spirit and that of other free Americans.
I shall not bow down to the socialists who use the government to reward those
who are undeserving, with the sweat of my brow, my blood and my tears. I shall
not bow down to the environmentalists who use the government to pass laws to
rob me of my constitutional rights. I shall not bow down to a government which
gives amnesty to illegal aliens, with the sole purpose of using my taxes to
buy the votes of lawbreakers, in order to retain power. I shall not bow down
to laws, rules, regulations and ordinances that repeal my God-given rights of
freedom and liberty.
As a free man, I refute and refuse to obey any laws that violate the sacred
rights granted by our God and our Constitution. I refuse to abide by federal
and state supreme court rulings that fly in the face of common law and that
repeal constitutional safeguards.
I believe that Alexander Hamilton was right when he said: "No legislative act
contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm
that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is
above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the
people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers
do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the
Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to
substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in
fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should
happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is
to be preferred to the statute."
As a free man, hear my cry against all the laws and acts by every level of
government every day of the year, that moves us ever deeper into absolute
slavery. It strips us of our individuality and attempts to meld us into a
mindless collective. It binds our hands and feet so that we cannot move in the
"light" of our cherished freedom.
I shall fight with all of my heart and soul to stop attempts by this and
future governments to merge America, the one remaining shining beacon in a
troubled and unstable world, into a North American Union, or the dreaded
one-world-order. For without a free, prosperous and powerful America, the
world has no chance, and will descend into Armageddon in short order. Should
our power and our prosperity evaporate, or become irrelevant, or sink into
third-world depravity, evil will fill the vacuum and evil will rule the world.
Just imagine for one minute, that China became more powerful than the United
States. Who or what would save us then?
The ship of America, riding on a sea of freedom and liberty, has freed over a
billion people. Our military might makes other governments with empirical
designs, think twice before adventuring into war with us, or others we
protect. We dare not let down our guard for one second. We dare not reduce our
military power to the point that other nations might be tempted to challenge
us. We dare not be detoured down the path of socialism, and remove the one
ingredient that makes us the most prosperous, industrious, creative, powerful
and generous nation on Earth, our freedom.
If Americans bow down to government tyranny today, tomorrow, or ever, all that
was won by the sacrifices of our Founding Fathers and the colonials who gave
everything to establish our freedom, and all the brave men and women who gave
their lives, their limbs and their minds thereafter, to defend our freedom,
will have been for naught. Veterans Day and Memorial Day will eventually have
no meaning - because to honor the fallen, but then stand by and let the reason
for their sacrifices be swept away in destructive apathy - dishonors their
memory and that sacrifice.
As a free man, I bow down to no man or no government who would tear down the
very fabric of our liberty, and render us nothing more than serfs to a
government fiefdom, which will eventually lead us into tyranny and chaos.
America is the world's last remaining hope, and if we do not defend the
promise of its freedom and liberty, we will be complicit in its demise, to the
detriment of every man, woman and child who walks this Earth and looks to
America for salvation.
If you consider yourself a free man (or woman) and refuse to bow down to any
other man, or an out-of-control government, then join with those of us who are
on the front lines of freedom, because just as sure as the Sun comes up in the
morning, the few of us will not be able to hold the flag of freedom much
longer, without the help of millions of Americans who believe that freedom,
not slavery, is our destiny.
As a free man, I pray to all that is holy to wake up my American brethren and
help them on the path to a free America, once again.
I. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State See, Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! See, Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
II. The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court: ONLY authorizes one to, 1. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
2. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT.
a. INFANTS
b. PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. See, Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4.
5. A. "CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE....
a. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.
b. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!! III. The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!! A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"
B. The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."
1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.
2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.
C. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.
1. See Texas Attorney General Dan Morales' letter,
as per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office! IV. The State Bar is; A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, see, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.
B. A ILLEGAL #& CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE:
C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.
D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing. ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!
E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas. V. State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . .Enrollment in the State Bar: "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW. ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR AND LICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME. THE BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE!!! It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of Texas and America. The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with treasonous goals in mind. They have accomplished 98% of their goals. The NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW. American People start the job for them...or before their "NEW WORLD ORDER" bosses, the International Bankers, gain the remaining 2%. Texas and American Lawyers should check historical records. They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in a power shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers and judges...for they always have proven themselves unworthy of any trust from either side! "Woe unto you (A woe is a curse) Lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge; you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered..." Luke 11:52. VI. The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION TRAITORS IN OUR MIDST: The founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution and formed our government, made it very clear that this was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE country and all Citizens are to be equal under Law and not a private capitalistic monopoly or cartel as they had experienced in Europe. Under free enterprise system, any Citizen who was willing to risk his time and finances, can go into business. The public with the freedom of choice, can patronize this business or decide they don't like the service or product and stay away; whereas, in a private or a capitalistic system, only the privileged elite can go into certain businesses or professions such as had been practiced in Europe for ages, making the public their CAPTIVE CUSTOMERS. The EUROPEAN BANKERS and FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to change AMERICA to the same system that they had so they could take over this government too, and sent some British lawyers over here to organize an American Bar Association on the same order as the English Bar where only Lords can be Judges and determine who shall practice law. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America. VII. The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives. Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. What is the real difference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white robes and fiery crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACK ROBES sitting on the bench? Aren't they as dictatorial as the KGB and the GESTAPO are accused of being? This has fulfilled Orwell's prediction for 1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT. Various groups that have been lawfully stoned walled by the ABA and the courts suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish the Bar Association as there are 17 states where Citizens have the Right to do this by the voting process. If we can do this it will destroy, the power of the Bar in America with similar method they used to gain their power, state by state. Any Citizens who live in one of these 17 states, can do this, and if not in one of these states you can contribute to other states that can. Who is going to run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR? The CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAW non-Union COUNSELORS. I would like to remind you that the Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble. The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves. The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state. The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe." The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM. We cannot hope to reclaim our Country if we continue to let that beast stay in our bed and in our homes. It is imperative that we remove this demon from its throne and put OUR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back into effect. We must stop worrying about what someone else will think, this is our country and we have foreign entities attempting to take control of us and our Nation. These children of Satan have nothing good in store for any of us, and those who are ignorant enough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy, deserve just what they receive because they ask for it. Consider: If Attorneys belong to a state bar which is a corporate monopoly are they and it subject to the various Anti Trust Acts? VIII. MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY: The small handful that are good must get on the right side and help us win our war, or they are not on our side. There can be no more sitting on the fence, people must decide which side they are on and fight.
Lawyers that claim to be on our side and are later found out to be traitors, must be put to death as this is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations. Americans cannot win the war if they allow traitors to infiltrate our tanks and get away with it. The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly enemy, that care nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them, you could be their next victim. IX. "TREASON" LAWYER AND LAWYER-JUDGE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL:
Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed in the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in the INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN (TREASON). They have already taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar associations, make a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY. This necessitated and URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP).. All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution, the 13th Amendment and Article I, Section 26 of the Texas Constitution. X. The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens.
When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves. In these Unconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) with a lot of hanky panky and hocus pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms. The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders. ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution." Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc. This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).
The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION. XI. LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES: Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY." Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH. These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. Since crime and treason are against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these TRAITORS, the lawyers.
As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS). XII. CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL: As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "No." The lawyer --judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissable. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court." Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRAND JURIES!
The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it. Imagine hypothetically how stupid it would be if any constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution." ORGANIZED CRIME never existed until the BAR ASSOCIATION took over OUR COURTS and OUR GOVERNMENT. Now crime is organized internationally, just as the Bar Associations are organized. Some of their international affiliations include but are not limited to THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSOCIATION; INTERNATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; WORLD PEACE THROUGH LAW CENTER; WORLD ASSEMBLY OF JUDGES: et al. This means that the Bar Associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY. XIII. Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS: ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system" of hanky panky and hocus pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE. ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF "TREASON." In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate. An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION. In all elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS, never vote for a lawyer. Vote FOR NON-LAWYERS ONLY. If only lawyers are running for election to the same office, do NOT vote for any of them, as most are ALL ALIKE. All lawyers are programmed to be "TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES." WALK SOFTLY AMERICANS AND CARRY A BIG STICK Most importantly don't be afraid to use it. We are under vicious assault and we must make use of every resource we have, or give into their slavery. COPY AND SPREAD WIDELY, SEND COPIES TO THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES. Consider, II Corinthians 5:7. For we walk/live by faith, not by sight.
Romans 13: Does it mean what the government would have us believe?
The actual FACT is that if you only have ONE lawyer in a town, [economically speaking] he will starve to death,
but if you have TWO lawyers in a town, well... they'll make a fortune! What might someone call a brain-dead lawyer, if/when combined with bribes, greed and corruption?
Answer: ... a "politician" (sad) (in Texas) What's the difference between a dead snake and a dead Attorney in the middle of the road?
Answer: ...skid marks before the snake!  ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility
"All the extravagance and incompetence of our present government is due, in the main, to lawyers, and, in part at least, to good ones. They are responsible for nine-tenths of the useless and vicious laws that now clutter the statute-books, and for all the evils that go with the vain attempt to enforce them. Every Federal judge is a lawyer. So are most Congressmen. Every invasion of the plain rights of citizens has a lawyer behind it. If all lawyers were hanged tomorrow, and their bones sold to a mah jong factory, we’d be freer and safer, and our taxes would be reduced by almost half"
H.L. Menchen, “Breathing Space,†The Baltimore Evening Sun (Aug. 4, 1924)  cartoon
Get to know THE STATE OF TEXAS Found at 2 Kepha(Peter) 2:2-3...
...And many will follow their destructive ways, and because of them, the way of truth will be evil spoken of.
and in their covetetousness shall they with feigned fashioned, made up words make merchandise of you... "U.S. Attorneys" NOT " U.S.A. Attorneys" LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell Renews Alliance with American Bar Association... Discover the International Standard Lawyer Number ( ISLN) system CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE§ 6067 INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY OF THE LAWYERS TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN Private Attorney General Reveals Role Exposing Michael Jackson's Unlicensed Attorney
Los Angeles County Office Of The District Attorney: UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW MANUAL FOR PROSECUTORS
NOTICE: Author not affiliated with Freedom School. See also, Competent Counsel Questionaire Bureaucrats Never Have a Case
ARE LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW? Proof That An Attorneys Retainer Is A Rip Off Study Finds Settling Is Better Than Going to Trial (Review comments made about this article HERE an interesting read.) Subject: Supreme court cases supporting no license. The Temples Of Baal
People cannot say that they did not receive Notice. Notice is given sometimes by books or movies such as the "Wizard of Oz" (1939), "The Matrix" (1998), "'V' for Vendetta," (March 17, 2006) and "The Truman Show" (1998) staring Jim Carrey whereby Truman (Carrey)discovers the Truth and finds a way out of the corporation that intended to take care of all his needs from cradle to grave in exchange for his life in the fiction world.
Herein lies a study of the "Wizard of Oz" in which Notice was given and remains current even to this day. The following is from the Library of Halexandria : The Wizard of Oz 
The Wizard of Oz was produced as a motion picture in 1939 by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. (Book by L. Frank Baum; Adaption by Noel Langley; Screenplay by Florence Ryerson, Noel Langley, and Edgar Allan Woolf; Lyrics by E. Y. Harburg; Produced by Mervyn LeRoy; Directed by Victor Fleming.) Many people believe that The Wizard of Oz was (and is) an allegory for the radically new state of affairs that existed in America in the 1930s, following the stock market crash and the bankruptcy of the United States Government which occurred immediately thereafter. For all extents and purposes, it can still be viewed as the current state of affairs, inasmuch as the allegorical nature, the clues strewn throughout the story, are still relevant today. The authors of Redemption in Law, Theory and Practice [BBC of America, 2000] have, for example, provided an interesting interpretation of the story of The Wizard of Oz, one which bears a considerable amount of attention being paid. Much of what follows, comes from pages 180 to 185 of their book. The initial setting of the story is, of course, Kansas, the geographical center of the USA, and the symbol for the heartland of America. The tornado (twister) that arrives is all about the whirling confusion that existed after the stock market crash, the theft of the country’s gold, the US Bankruptcy, and the Great Depression. The twister takes Dorothy and her dog, Toto, into a new, artificial dimension, above the solid ground of Kansas. Upon their arrival, Dorothy notes: “Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.†Right on, Dorothy. After the bankruptcy, Kansas was no longer “Kansasâ€, but now “KSâ€, an artificial corporate venue of the bankrupt US, a newly established “federal territoryâ€, and part of the “Federal Zoneâ€. Dorothy and Toto were “in this stateâ€, which according to Redemption in Law, implies they were for tax jurisdiction purposes in the “District of Columbia†(aka “United Statesâ€) -- whereas Kansas is not included in “this stateâ€, “KS†is. One of the first entities Dorothy met was the Scarecrow, who represented the legal Straw Man which had been created as an artificial aspect of the former American sovereigns. The legal term, Straw Man, describes a fictitious or artificial person created by law at one’s birth via the inscription in all-capital letters on the birth document/certificate -- the latter being document of title and a negotiable instrument. It is allegedly by way of the Straw Man that the creditors of the US Bankruptcy can so effectively (and legally?) take for their own use the benefits of individuals’ labor, creativity, talents, and productivity. In the movie the Scarecrow, describes his straw-man persona by noting: “Some people without brains do an awful lot of talking. Of course, I’m not bright about doing things.†The Scarecrow then succinctly describes himself in the classic song, “If I Only Had a Brain.†The lyrics include: “I’d unravel every riddle, For every ‘individdle,’ In trouble or in pain.†The translation is that for every individual, who discovers the existence of his or her legal Straw Man, all political and legal mysteries, complexities, and confusions begin to be resolved. And once that same individual takes legal title to his or her Straw Man, he or she can protect themselves from legal trouble or legal damage. The Tin Man arrives next on the scene. I.e. the “T-I-N†(Taxpayer Identification Number) Man is a hollow man of metal, a “vessel†or “vehicleâ€, the newly created commercial code words for the Straw Man. Just as the Scarecrow/Straw Man has no brain, the Tin Man has no heart. Both are “artificial personsâ€. Natural person are created by nature or God, while artificial persons are created by human laws, for the purposes of society/government (“bodies politic†or “corporationsâ€). One of the definitions in Webster’s Dictionary is “counterfeitâ€. Thus the Tin Man might also represent the mechanical and heartless aspect of commerce and commercial law. As they are reputed to say in the Mafia: “Nothing personal, it’s just business.†The Tin Man also carries an ax. Did you ever wonder about that? The ax is a traditional symbol for that which is above a King. In this case, commercial law, i.e. Corporate Rule is above the sovereign! It’s not a nice connotation -- any more than the “Axis Powers†of World War II included Nazi Germany, Italy (a fascist state) and Japan; or the more recent “Axis of Evilâ€, coined by President George Bush in 2002, but curiously not yet applied to Cheney, Ashcroft and himself -- the ABC’s of such. The Tin Man, expressing relief after Dorothy had oiled his arm, said: “I’ve held that ax up for ages.†And perhaps he is still having to do so. For the symbol for fascism is the “fascesâ€, a bundle of rods with an ax bound up in the middle, but with its blade projecting. This fasces may be found on the American Mercury-head Dime (the Roman deity Mercury was the God of Commerce), and on the wall behind, and on each side of, the speaker’s podium in the US Senate (each gold fasces being approximately six feet in height). At the base of the podium of the seal of the US Senate are two crossed fasces. Hmmmm... Dorothy, the Scarecrow and Tin Man are soon joined by the Cowardly Lion. Known as the “king of the beastsâ€, it’s surprising to find one so cowardly. It appears to represent the once-fearless American people who had lost their courage, the courage to denounce the US Bankruptcy, and inform its creditors that they were not the chattel that could be used as collateral for the moneys allegedly owed. Of course, dealing with the IRS tends to leave most of us in the cowardly state; but that is due in large part to the heartless, brainless actions of an organization operating strictly under the laws of Commerce. In order for Dorothy and the gang to find the Wizard (the supposed answer to their prayers), they had to “follow the yellow brick road.†In other words, follow the money -- the trail of the gold taken from America -- and find who had absconded with it. It’s important to recall from the beginning of the movie, that the Wizard was represented by a traveling mystic, a “Professor Marvel,†whom Dorothy had first encountered when she ran away with Toto. The Professor’s shingle claimed that he was “Acclaimed by the Crowned Heads of Europe, Past, Present, and Future.†That’s quite a claim -- to include the future -- but seems well justified in that the Wizard is still acclaimed by the “crowned heads of Europe.†Before the Banksters looted America, they had already disempowered the monarchies of Europe and looted their kingdoms. And with a human skull atop the perch above the door to his wagon, the Wizard began to lecture Dorothy about the priests of Isis and Osiris and the days of Egypt’s pharaohs. Between 1916 and 1933, most of America’s gold was rounded up -- aided by President Franklin Roosevelt (whose physical problems may well have symbolized America’s “crippled stateâ€). The gold went to The Federal Reserve private Bank, and was shipped off by the Fed owners to England and Germany. This was accomplished because of the fact Federal Reserve Notes could be redeemed in gold, and their use carried an interest penalty that could also only be paid in gold. The US traded its gold for paper, while its previous currency, United States Notes, carried no such interest requirement. When the US Bankruptcy was declared in 1933, there was the added caveat that all Americans were required to turn in all gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates by May 1 -- Our heroine was Dorothy Gale. Did you know her last name? Or that a gale, with the impact of water as well as wind, is considered potentially more powerful than a tornado? In any case, when she and her friends emerged from the forest, they were elated to see the Emerald City only a short distance away. The Wicked Witch of the West, desperate for the ruby slippers that Dorothy was wearing, knew she had to make her move before Dorothy and the others were inside the walls of Emerald City. But what was so special about Dorothy’s slippers? Was the Wicked Witch an earlier version of Emelda Marcus? Or something else? Obviously, Dorothy’s red-colored, ruby slippers were the same color as blood, as in flesh and blood, thus symbolizing a living, breathing man or woman -- i.e. a non-corporation, a natural person. As such her slippers also symbolized “private†as opposed to “publicâ€. (Even a Social InSecurity card uses a red serial number, signifying the private-side account and its attachment to the public-side.) It is likely the ruby slippers symbolized the blood in the veins of the American people -- as opposed to “citizens of the United Statesâ€, where the blue and black ink on a birth certificate is the “corporate bloodâ€. The Wicked Witch wanted the life blood of the living human beings -- not just their Straw Men. Her tactic was to cover the countryside with poppy flowers -- i.e. the source of heroin, opium, and morphine -- symbolically drugging Dorothy, et al into unconsciousness, and then just step in and snatch the slippers. I.e. dull the senses of the American people and then slip in and swipe the gold. The drugging worked on Dorothy, the Lion and Toto, the flesh and blood friends, but did not effect the artificial persons of the Scarecrow and Tin Man. The latter two cried out for help, and the Good Witch of the North came to the rescue with a blanket of snow to nullify the narcotic effect of the poppies on Dorothy, the Lion and Toto. [So, who’s the “Good Witch of the Northâ€? Perhaps, that remains to be seen.] The identity of the Wicked Witch of the West is pretty clear. Recall that her counterpart in the first part of the film was “Almira Gulchâ€, who supposedly “owned half the county†(or perhaps half the country). Miss Gulch had arrived at Dorothy’s farm with an “Order from the Sheriff†(an Executive Order from President Roosevelt?) demanding that Toto be handed over, because allegedly he had bitten Miss Gulch. Despite Aunt Em’s assertion about Toto (“He’s really gentle, with gentle people, that is.â€) Miss Gulch pressed her case saying that to withhold Toto would be to “go against the lawâ€. When Dorothy refused to surrender toto, Miss Gulch lashed out with, “If you don’t hand over that dog I’ll bring a damned suit that’ll take your whole farm!†70% of the attorneys in the world reside in the West -- America. 95% of all lawsuits in the world are filed under US jurisdiction. The Wicked Witch of the West (Miss Gulch) was dressed in black, the choice of color for judges’ robes. Thus she represents judges and attorneys, essentially the American legal system (including the attorney-run US Congress). These are the executioners and primary henchmen for transferring the wealth of America from the people to the banksters. The “Bar†has a curious history. It represents the body of attorneys, counselors, judges and the members of the legal profession. It has been alleged that Black’s Law Dictionary, for example, is copyrighted British law and that the so-called American Bar Association is a branch or subset of the Bar Council (the sole bar association in England and Wales). As the copyrighted property of a British company, all state Codes in the US are commercial, private British-owned law. Attorneys may be even worse, if possible, than we thought! Apparently, the Wicked Witch of the West is nothing more than an operative of the “crowned heads of Europe†(who are owned by the Banksters), and desperately wanted not only the precious metals of America, but the life blood of America’s labor. Her counterpart, of course, wanted to take Toto. The word, Toto, comes from the phrase, “in totoâ€, which according to Black’s Law Dictionary (the British “rule bookâ€) is: “in the whole, completely.†In other words, she wanted everything! Once Dorothy and the gang had encountered the mighty Wizard of Oz, they initially fell for the illusion. But with Toto’s aid in pulling back the curtain, they quickly realized the Wizard was nothing more than a con man. Even when he supposedly helped Scarecrow about getting a “brainâ€, he cited “the land of ‘E Pluribus Unum,’â€, which is Latin for “one out of many.†This phrase appears on the American One Dollar Bill, but might be thought of as “converting the many into oneâ€, i.e. establishing a “New World Orderâ€. The Wizard was also supposedly amenable to taking Dorothy back in his balloon, but ended up leaving her behind. Fortunately, the Good Witch of the North (Santa Claus?), stepped in to tell Dorothy, “You don’t need to be helped. You’ve always had the power to go back to Kansas.†All she had to do was to use her slippers! The contention is that everyone has the right and power to reclaim their Sovereignty, but just forgot. The actual act of reclamation -- the Remedy and Recourse, is telling the Banksters that you are no longer collateral, i.e. filing with a Secretary of State. Because the IRS (Infernal Revenue Service) is an accountancy firm and collection agency for the private Federal Reserve Bank, having been constituted under the UCC at its inception in 1954 (and operating strictly in that realm ever since), filing or not filing income tax returns becomes an interesting study in itself. Just be sure to do your own research! The title of the movie also carries a message. A “wizardâ€, of course, is “a very clever or skillful person.†“Oz†on the other hand is an abbreviation for “ouncesâ€, which is always the unit of measurement for gold, silver, and other precious metals. Even for large quantities of gold, etceteras, the amount is expressed in million ounces of gold, and not tons or pounds. In the end, Dorothy (i.e. the American people) and Toto made it home. There is, in fact, Remedy and Recourse in law. It’s there, disguised, camouflaged, encoded. (Why do you think States call their statutory laws, “codes†and not laws?) It’s a matter of learning the law. All of it. It’s the necessary condition for becoming sovereign once again. Unless, of course, you’d prefer to continue to be conned by the Banksters. The Wizard of Oz is really a delightful movie. The fact that it symbolizes one of the worst episodes in the world’s history of the denial of freedom or justice, should not be construed to imply that the movie and story are not entertaining. In fact, once the symbolic nature is seen and understood, it is a simple step to smile, take the next step to go beyond it, and go forth as if you knew where you were going. It’s all just part of The Fool’s Journey, and the strange path we have each chosen to fulfill our diverse and unique destinies. We always have that choice! It’s called Free Will. Meanwhile, it is worth while recalling the sage advice of Lao Tzu (c. 600 B.C.E.) and more recently and succinctly in our Oz analogy, Frank Zappa (May 1977): "The more prohibitions there are, the poorer the people will be." "The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way, and you will see a brick wall at the back of the theater."
Republic vs. Democracy United States Constitution Art. 4 Sec. 4 Par. 1
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government.†[Not a democracy.]
Pledge of Allegiance – “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands …â€
As Benjamin Franklin was leaving the building where, after four months of hard work, the Constitution had been completed and signed, a lady asked him what kind of government the convention had created. A very old, very tired, and very wise Benjamin Franklin replied; “A Republic, ma’am if you can keep it.†(Webster’s dictionary definition: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.) Democracy: Operates by direct majority vote of the people. When an issue is to be decided, the entire population votes on it; the majority wins and rules. A democracy is rule by majority feeling (what the Founding Fathers described as “mobocracyâ€). Example: in a democracy, if a majority of the people decides that murder is no longer a crime, murder will no longer be a crime. Republic: Where the general population elects representatives who then pass laws to govern the nation … a republic is rule by law. Our republic is a form of government where power is separated, [our Founding Fathers knew that people are basically weak, sinful and corruptible, (Jeremiah 17:9)], pitting men against each other, making it difficult to pass laws and make changes. WARNINGS John Witherspoon, signer - “Pure democracy cannot subsist long nor be carried far into the departments of state – it is very subject to caprice and the madness of popular rage.†Zephaniah Swift, author of America’s first legal text - “It may generally be remarked that the more a government resembles a pure democracy the more they abound with disorder and confusion.†Benjamin Rush, signer - “ a simple democracy … is one of the greatest of evils.†John Quincy Adams - “The experience of all former ages had shown that of all human governments, democracy was the most unstable, fluctuating and short-lived.†Noah Webster - “In democracy … there are commonly tumults and disorders … Therefore a pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth.†James Madison - “Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.†John Adams - “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.†Fisher Ames, author of the House language for the First Amendment - “A democracy is a volcano which conceals the fiery materials of its own destruction. These will produce an eruption and carry desolation in their way. The known propensity of a democracy is to licentiousness which the ambitious call, and the ignorant believe to be liberty !! NOTE … look at today’s sexual freedoms. Gouverneur Morris, signer and penman of the Constitution - “We have seen the tumult of democracy terminate … as [it has] everywhere terminated, in despotism … Democracy! savage and wild. Thou who wouldst bring down the virtuous and wise to the level of folly and guilt.†Samuel Adams – “… it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds …†End of Warnings What is the source of law for the American republic? According to Founder Noah Webster: “Our citizens should early understand that the genuine source of correct republican principles is the Bible, particularly the New Testament, or the Christian religion.†In our republic, murder will always be a crime, for it is always a crime according to the Word of God. In the American republic, principles that do not change and which are certain and universal in their operation upon all the members of the community of man were the principles of Biblical natural law … the basis of our Declaration, Constitution and legal system. Professor Montesquieu, a French professor, author and legal philosopher who wrote the highly influential book, The Spirit Of The Laws, (which was read and studied intently in America) was the source of our division of power in our government. Baron Charles Montesquieu was the second most frequently quoted source, next to the Holy Bible, out of all the references used by our Founding Fathers.He was the source of our division of power in government; (i.e.. legislative, administrative, judicial) claiming Isaiah 33:22 as the source; the Lord is our King, the Lord is our Judge and the Lord is our Lawgiver. Montesquieu identified the rule of law as “natural law†which is based on the Holy Bible. He identified the rule of law as “principles that do not changeâ€. Natural Law is the law God gave His people through the Bible and the Ten Commandments. In 1748, Montesquieu wrote; “Nor is there liberty if the power of judging is not separated from legislative power and from executive power. If it [the power of judging] were joined to legislative power, the power over life and liberty of the citizens would be arbitrary, for the judge would be the legislature if it were joined to the executive power, the judge could have the force of an oppressor. All would be lost if the same … body of principal men … exercised these three powers. Our Founding Fathers gave us an Electoral College because we are a Republic … not a democracy. The Electoral College follows the principle of elected representation. It was designed to further promote the ideals of balance, and of separation of powers. It gives the smaller States true representation in a fair and just manner by allowing their voices (as well as rural America) to be heard. It prevents the control of the Nation by highly populated urban centers, thus reducing the risk of elections being bought or won by fraud where power could be consolidated. Noah Webster - “When you become entitled to exercise the right of voting for public officers, let it be impressed on your mind that God commands you to choose for rulers, just men who will rule in the fear of God. The preservation of a Republican government depends on the faithful discharge of this duty; if the citizens neglect their duty and place unprincipled men in office the government will soon be corrupted; laws will be made, not for the public good, so much as for selfish or local purposes; corrupt or incompetent men will be appointed to execute the laws; the public revenues will be squandered on unworthy men; and the rights of the citizens will be violated or disregarded. If a Republican government fails to secure public prosperity and happiness, it must be because the citizens neglect their divine commands and elect bad men to make and administer laws.†Jedediah Moore, Founding educator -“To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness which mankind now enjoys. In proportion as the genuine effects of Christianity are diminished in any nation … in the same proportion will the people of that nation recede from the blessings of genuine freedom …All efforts to destroy the foundations of our Holy religion, ultimately tend to the subversion also of our political freedom and happiness. Whenever the pillars of Christianity shall be overthrown our present Republican forms of government, and all the blessings which flow from them, must fall with them.†George Mason, father of Bill of Rights - “We are now to rank among the nations of the world; but whether our independence shall prove a blessing or a curse must depend upon our own wisdom or folly, virtue or wickedness …Justice and virtue are the vital principles of a republican government.†GOD’S LAWAll our laws are arranged into two different classes. 1. Divine – coming from God’s natural laws and His ten commandments. 2. Human – Matters that are not commanded or forbidden by God’s natural law. U.S. Supreme Court, 1892 – “Our laws and our institutions must necessarily be based upon the teachings of the Redeemer of Mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent, our civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian.†Benjamin Franklin – “We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings, that ‘except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it.’ I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without His concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel.†James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution - “We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to The Ten Commandments of God.†George Washington, father of our country – “It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.†AT THE CONVENTION On the fourth of July 1787, the entire convention was assembled in the Reformed Calvinistic Church, assembled there by the direction of Edmond Randolph of Virginia. The sermon and prayer was conducted by Rev. William Rogers – a portion of his prayer; “We fervently recommend to the Fatherly notice … our Federal Convention … Favor them, from day to day, with Thy inspiring presence; be their wisdom and strength; enable them to devise such measures as may prove happy instruments in healing all divisions and prove the good of the whole; … that the United States of America may form one example of a free and virtuous government… May we … continue, under the influence of Republican virtue, to partake of all the blessings of cultivated and Christian society.†John Witherspoon, signer, member of the Continental Congress, served on over 100 committees, a teacher who influenced students who included; a President -James Madison, a Vice President, three Supreme Court Justices, 10 Cabinet members, 12 Governors, 21 Senators, 39 Representatives as well as numerous delegates to the Constitutional Convention and state conventions. He served as President of Princeton University. His quotes; 1.“Cursed be all that learning that is contrary to the cross of Christ.†2.“Whoever is an avowed enemy of God; I scruple not [do not hesitate] to call him an enemy of his country.†3. John Adams at Witherspoon’s death said: “A true son of liberty. So he was. But first, he was a son of the Cross.†John Hancock, signer –“The very existence of the Republic … depends much upon the public institutions of religion.†Alexis deTocqueville, the Principle of Sovereignty of the People in America - “ It dominates the whole of American society. The Americans applied this principle even before their Revolution. Its growth was a result of the Revolution … in America the sovereignty of the people is neither hidden nor sterile as with most other nations; mores recognize it, and the laws proclaim it; it spreads with freedom and attains unimpeded its ultimate consequences.†Chairman’s comment; Our Founding Fathers chose a Republic over a Democracy for many reasons; primarily because they remembered the most infamous “democratic†vote in all history. [i.e.] The lesson of a bureaucrat some 2000 years ago who turned to a crowd and asked which prisoner should be released – the crowd yelled - “give us Barabbasâ€. The ‘will of the people’ spoke that day. When the bureaucrat asked the people what should be done with this innocent, this Jesus, the crowd responded with a loud – CRUCIFY HIM. Jesus was crucified by a majority vote exercising pure democracy which was the emotional, changing rule of the mob or as we call it today mobocracy. This is the reason our Founding Fathers wanted a Republic, a government based on the rule of law which could not be changed by the whims of the people. Samuel Huntington, signer and Governor of Connecticut - “While the great body of freeholders are acquainted with the duties which they owe to their God, to themselves, and to men, they will remain free. But if ignorance and depravity should prevail they will inevitably lead to slavery and ruin.â€
Natural Existence God and Goddes --> Man --> We are all one with God/Goddess and Creation Ego Mind of man Creates | Fiction --> Government --> Instituions and Corporations --> Persons (debt slaves) Our Natural Universe upon creation nothing has a name Man imagines the Natural Univeers as being inside a box and puts names on everything and then names himself as a person. When we step outside of the box back into truth man is there again able to create another box if he wants. The names can change inside the box but the Natural Universe does not, because it is truth. Truth is not fiction so as much as man tries to change fiction, the truth remains. Creation does not create fiction it creates from itself for itself and all is equal to each other because it all comes from one Creator one Universal mind as it were. Thus if we are all created equally there can be no authority in truth as we are all equal. In fiction we can create stories and hierchy and control structures because nothing is really based upon truth, we simply commit a fraud by pertending that the Natural universe is created in fiction. Lets say you graduated University and got a Diplomia. The Diplomia was given to you by a University. Can that University appear before us and say that it did? No it can't it must have a actor in fiction a person do it. A fiction can not create only man can, but man pretends to do it inside the box of fiction. In truth there is no University in the Natural Universe. Thus your Diplomia can not be applied to as being a man in truth, because it was not created in the Natural Universe. The Courts and Law only exist in the box of fiction. Outside the box all we can point at is a building structure that they call a court, but that is only hearsay, because if we change the name the building structure stays the same. Thus all thier laws, which are not laws, but codes, rules, Statutes and regulations only exist inside the box and are created by actors in fiction. The laws do not exist in the Natural Universe because the Court and the Government do not exist there. All Law comes from Authority. We are all equal to each other in the Natural Universe. So they created this box and used extortion and violated our natural authority to the resources of this planet, by using force to control them. They violated the natural equality of all life to beinfit the few over the many. Countries exist in fiction not in the Natural Universe. I can perhaps draw a picture to help you see this more clearly. I realize that you are viewing your perspective from inside the box as that is all you have known. You like everyone else has been conditioned to believe that the living within the box is the norm, when it is the fraud. This is why in Genesis 1:26-28 we are given dominion over all the earth and over every living "thing" that moveth upon the earth. A thing is any form of life that has acepted a name or title and thus is operating unnaturally in accordance to the natural creation process. If I said I was your King and you must obey me. You would look at me and say, you are just a man, where do you get your authority from? If I pull out a gun and force you to be my subject or trick you into being my subject, it still does not change the fact that we are both still man created in the Natural Universe by what you want to call the creator. The universe is made up of energy and we are all constructs of that energy, all equal all one energy. So let me know if this helps, maybe provide me with some questions and I can help you see this. I'll maybe draw a diagram if that might help. April 12, 2010
Alright everyone since the hijacking and theft of all of my content for my citizens for a free America website. I have created a new Patriot group and will have a site up and running by the first of the new year! My goal is the same, to educate as many people as I can about your unalienable rights and what they mean and how you can reclaim your sovereignty as well as becoming a thorn in the Govenor's ass by protesting every unconstitutional code, statue and agency that the state has created! Power is in numbers, and if we put the pressure on at the State level we will get things done, unlike at the federal level where we are ignored! ie; the health care bill. I hope that I will be able to get through to people and gain a big enough following to make a real difference and to be an example for people of other states to do the same. God bless and I will be posting updates and information regularly....Goose
You have Unalienable not Inalienable rights
Unalienable ( Un-Lien-able) vs. Inalienable Rights
The Original Bill of Rights (Left Image) & Declaraton of Independence (Right Image)
 
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Declaration of Independence, 2nd para.
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of
certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others
retained by the people." Amendment IX, U.S. Constitution Bill of Rights,
i.e. framers recognized other rights that preceded the constitution,
rights inherent in Anglo American Common Law and in natural law.
"Jefferson's original draft of
this phrase in the Declaration of Independence was written: "We hold
these truths to be sacred and undeniable; that all men are created equal
and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights
inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Members of the Declaration committee of the
Continental Congress that had been selected to write the document
included Benjamin Franklin and John Adams who had different beliefs. The
word "inalienable" was changed to "unalienable" and read: "We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness."
The above two paragraphs come from Mary Mostert
in an article she wrote on January 11, 2006 "Unalienable vs. inalienable
rights". She explains the change; as Thomas Jefferson reflected a Deist
philosophy and did not believe in a loving and caring Heavenly Father
vs. the 18th century version of "intelligent design" reflected by
Franklin and Adams.
"Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred."
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, pg. 1523
"You cannot surrender, sell or transfer
unalienable rights, they are a gift from the creator to the individual
and cannot under any circumstances be surrendered or taken. All
individual's have unalienable rights"
"Inalienable rights: Rights which are not
capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the
one possessing such rights." Morrison v. State, Mo. App. 252 S.W. 2d 97,
101
"You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable
rights if you consent either actually or constructively... Inalienable
rights are not inherent in man and can be alienated by government.
Persons have inalienable rights. Most state constitutions recognize only inalienable rights."
"It has been well said, by one of the ablest
judges of the age, that a "constitution is not to receive a technical
construction, like a common law instrument or a stature. It is to be
interpreted so as to carry out the great principles of the government,
not to defeat them." Per Gibson, C.J. in Commonwealth v. Clark, 7 Watts
& S. (Pa.), 133. Butler V. Com. of Pennsylvania, 51 U.S. 402 (1850)
"The very highest duty of the States, when they
entered into the Union under the Constitution, was to protect all
persons within their boundaries in the enjoyment of these "unalienable
rights with which they were endowed by their Creator.", U.S. v.
Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
"....The first ten amendments to the
Constitution, adopted as they were soon after the adoption of the
Constitution, are in the nature of a bill of rights, and were adopted in
order to quiet the apprehension of many, that without some such
declaration of rights the government would assume, and might be held to
possess, the power to trespass upon those rights of persons and property
which by the Declaration of Independence were affirmed to be
unalienable rights. United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222
(1956)"
"The traditional American
philosophy teaches that Man, the Individual, is endowed at birth with
rights which are unalienable because given by his Creator. This
governmental philosophy is uniquely American. The concept of Man's
rights being unalienable is used solely upon the belief in their Divine
origin. Lacking this belief, there is no moral basis for any claim that
they are unalienable or for any claim to the great benefits flowing fro
this concept.
God given rights are sometimes called Natural Rights -
those possessed by Man under the Laws of Nature, meaning under the Laws
of God's creation and therefore by gift of God. Man has no power to
alienate - to dispose of by surrender, barter or gift - his God given
rights, according to the American philosophy. This is the meaning of
"Unalienable.
An Endless List of Rights - To attempt to
name all these rights starting with "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness", mentioned in the Declaration of Independence would be to
start an endless list which would add up to the whole of Man's Freedom
from Government over Man. They would add up to the entirety of
Individual Liberty (Liberty against Government over Man).
Innumerable rights of the Individual embraced in
the Ninth Amendment, which states; "The enumeration in the Constitution
of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others
retained by the people.
Freedom of Choice - Some idea of how vast the
list would be is indicated by just one general freedom which leads into
almost all of Free Man's activities of daily living through out life;
freedom of choice. This term stands for the right to do and equally not
do this or that, as conscience, whim or judgment, taste or desire of The
Individual may promp.........for as long as life lasts; but always, of
course, with due regard for the equal rights of others and for the just
laws expressive of .."just powers" of government designed to help
safeguard the equal rights of all individuals. Spelled out in detail,
this single freedom - freedom of choice - is almost all embracing.
Right To Be Let Alone - In one sense, such
freedom to choose involves Man's right to be let alone, which is
possessed by The Individual in keeping with the Declaration and
Constitution as against government; in enjoyment of his unalienable
rights, while respecting the equal rights of others and just laws...This
right to be let alone is the most comprehensive of rights and the right
of most prized by civilized men. This right is, of course, also
possessed as against all other individuals, all obligated to act
strictly within the limits of their own equal rights. Consequently any
infringement of any Individual's rights is precluded.
Neither government nor any Individuals, acting
singly, or in groups, or in organizations, could possibly possess any
"just power" (to use again the significant term of the Declaration) to
violate any Individual's God given, unalienable rights or the supporting
rights.
No government can abolish or destroy, nor can it rightfully, or constitutionall..y, violate Man's God given rights.
Government cannot justly interfere with Man's deserved enjoyment of any of these rights. No public official, nor all such officials combined, could possibly have any such power morally. Government can, to be sure, unjustly and
unconstitutiona..lly interfere by force with the deserved enjoyment of
Man's unalienable rights. It is, however, completely powerless to abolish or destroy them. It is in defense of these rights of all
Individuals, in last analysis, that the self governing people, acting in
accordance with, and in support of, the Constitution, oppose any and
all violators, whether public officials or usurpers, or others.
"Immediately apparent from the Declaration is a recognition of the laws of nature and of nature's God. This speaks of fixed, uniform and universal rules of action established by God. The laws of nature and of nature's God are the source of the unalienable rights of mankind. Civil governments are bound to secure those rights, including property." - http:../../..www...lonang...com/..curriculum/..2/s21d.htm
"That all men are by nature equally
free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which,
when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact,
deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and
liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and
pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety" - June 12, 1776, Bill of
Rights of the Constitution of Virginia
That, coupled with the Declaration's presupposition that governments are instituted to secure, not to hamper, men's rights, would suggest that some constitutional limitation upon the power of government, including the power of the federal government, against interference with the right to contract, would be consistent with the principles of the Declaration. However, the Declaration does not provide the gauge for judging the scope intended for the particular words chosen for the Contract Clause." - http:../../..www...lonang...com/..curriculum/..3/s34.htm
Such a limitation on government would also be consistent with what may be called a Biblical model. That model begins with God as the Creator of all things and, therefore, Lord over all Creation. It recognizes that man is created in the image of God, and that man thus owes his very existence to God and has a duty to honor and obey God.It recognizes what might be termed the Creation Mandate - God's command to man to be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth and take dominion over all of its resources, all to God's glory." - http:../../..www...lonang...com/..curriculum/..3/s34.htm
Government by consent is an unalienable right because it is given by God to all human beings. Consequently, this right is beyond the authority or jurisdiction of any government, federal or otherwise, to impair by regulation, balancing or otherwise. The independent agency, on the other hand, is a statutory creation of the federal government. I suggest that the independent agency, as we know it today, is repugnant to the Constitution. Of more significance to those who live under the reign of such agencies, their creation and continuation is antithetical to the spirit of a free people. - http:../../..www...lonang...com/..foundation/..4/f44a.htm
"Because the drafters of the Constitution had
been faithful to the principles of the Declaration, Adams believed the
Constitution would prove itself to be for the people as Mount
Gerizim.
Adams' warning uttered a century and a half
ago of the consequences flowing from departure from the principles of
the Declaration seems almost prophetic. Judicial nullification of the Contract
Clause, designed to protect unalienable rights of individuals,
accomplished by the Court's application of an ever-expanding police
power doctrine with its foundation upon the unalienable powers of
government, seems a clear disregard of Adams' warning. Today the parallel with Mount Ebal and Mount Gerizim can also be drawn. However, on the basis of the history of the
Contract Clause that reflects the great transformation which has
occurred with respect to presuppositions.. about unalienable individual
rights and the role and power of government, such a parallel would be
drawn differently. To paraphrase Adams, it would be more
appropriately said today: Fellow-..citizens, the ark of your covenant is
the Declaration of Independence. Your Mount Gerizim is the written Constitution. And your Mount Ebal is the judicially
revised Constitution, which is fashioned not upon the self-evident
truths of the Declaration of Independence - namely the natural and
unalienable rights of man, the indefeasible sovereignty of the people,
always subordinate to a rule of right and wrong, and always responsible
to the Supreme Ruler of the universe for their rightful exercise; but rather upon the unalienable powers of
government, the indefeasible sovereignty of the state, guided by
expediency upon a sea of shifting values, and responsible for its
exercise not to the Supreme Ruler of the universe but only to the
Supreme Court.
Adams' closing admonition urged his fellow citizens to adhere to the principles of the Declaration "as to the cords of your eternal salvation." Were he speaking today he would modify his admonition to urge them to return to those principles so that "your children's children [at the Tri-Centennial celebration of the Constitution may] celebrate it again in the full enjoyment ... of all the blessings promised to the children of Israel upon Mount Gerizim, as the reward of obedience to the law of God. Let it be so." - http:../../..www...lonang...com/..curriculum/..3/s34.htm#8
"From these passages it is evident;
that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it
protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man.
Men have a sense of property: Property is
necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants
and desires; its scrutiny was one of the objects, that induced them to
unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of this honest labour and industry. The preservation of property then is a
primary object of the social compact, and but the late Constitution of
Pennsylvania, was made a fundamental law. No one can be called upon to surrender or
sacrifice his whole property, real and personal, for the good of the
community, without receiving a recompense in value. The English history does not furnish an instance of the kind; the Parliament, with all their boasted omnipotence, never committed such an outrage on private property; and if they had, it would have served only to display the dangerous nature of unlimited authority; it would have been an exercise of power and not of rights." U.S. Supreme Court Justice Vanhorne's statement
after reading the 1st, 8th and 11th articles of the Declaration of
Rights and 9th and 46th sections Constitution of Pennsylvania, 1795.
Credit to Washington Supreme Court Justice Sanders Presentation
"One encroachment leads to another; precedent gives birth to precedent; what has been done may be done again; thus radical principles are generally broken in upon, and the constitution eventually destroyed. Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons only, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another. the rights of private property are regulated, protected, and governed by general, known, and established laws; and decided upon, by general, know, and established tribunals; laws and tribunals not made and created on an instant exigency, on an urgent emergency, to serve a present turn, or the interest of a moment." - http:../../..press-..pubs...uchicago...edu/..founders/..documents/..v1ch16s24.html
"What god hath given, man cannot take" Unknown source
Read more: http://bulletins.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=bulletin.read&authorID=124087568&messageID=6677328120&actp=n%2b0prKAebczfG13CmB%2fL170xxzjSK8k%2f19igSi%2f1c3uQLTXTYANJMky0
Act of 1871 Act of 1871
Act of 1871
1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for
the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of
government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see,
Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).
The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in
the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests
(international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the
coffers and neck of America. Congress cut a deal with the international bankers
(specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because
the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without
serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the
United States.
The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The
corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original
Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was
defaced -- in effect vandalized and sabotage -- when the title was capitalized
and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of
the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic
capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the
Republic. It does is not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring
to a legal document· This seemingly "minor" alteration has had a major impact
on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing
the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the
government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This
file:///C|/Documents and Settings/Byron Wine/Desktop/Act of 1871.htm (1 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits
only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely
outside the original (organic) Constitution.
Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic
Constitution, we the people now have "relative" rights or privileges. One
example is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has now been transformed
(under corporate government policy) into a "privilege" that requires citizens to
be licensed. (Passports) By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed
TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees
of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. [Information
courtesy of Lisa Guliani, www.babelmagazine.com. The Act of 1871 became the
FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dove: The following is an expansion and further explanation of the above (an
adaptation of Lisa's work, done with her permission), which you may want to
read for your own edification. Whereas my Chapter 9 is a time-map of the major
Headlines and Landmines of the 200-years-plus history of America, each
subsequent chapter goes into particular details. This section is from Chapter 18,
"The Tale of Two Governments, which overall addresses the difference between
a democracy and a republic as well as the fact of a federal government and a
shadow government practicing under the guise of The Corporation. I'm sure Lisa
won't mind your using what you need in order to make whatever point you wish
to make in the moment. . . . C.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'
The United States Isn't a Country; It's a Corporation! In preparation for stealing
America, the puppets of Britain's banking cabal had already created a second
government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what the common
herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED
STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed the
common herd all rights of sui juris. [you, in your sovereignty]
Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of government for
the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land. WHY and HOW did
they do so? First, Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, reminds us that the Civil War
was, in fact, "little more than a calculated front with fancy footwork by
backroom players." Then she adds: "It was also a strategic maneuver by British
and European interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold
on the coffers of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire
financial straits, certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international
bankers (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into
everyone's pie). . . . . There you have the WHY, why members of Congress
permitted the international bankers to gain further control of America. . . . . .
"Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as
file:///C|/Documents and Settings/Byron Wine/Desktop/Act of 1871.htm (2 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the
organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word 'for' to 'of' in the
title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers
read: 'The Constitution for the united states of America.' [note that neither the
words 'united' nor 'states' began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA' is a corporate constitution, which is
absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our
rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the
international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."
To fully understand how our rights of sovereignty were ended, you must know
the full meaning of sovereign: "Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in
position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or
entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction." (Webster).
In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns -- free
citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land – was stolen from us,
along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original Constitution,
only We the People are sovereign. Government is not sovereign. The Declaration
of Independence say, "…government is subject to the consent of the governed."
That's us -- the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a sovereign? As Lisa
Guliani explained:
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that
the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the governed
since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject to the
whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the
ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In fact, it has
invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO
jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does. "You see,
you are 'presumed' to know the law, which is very weird since We the People
are taught NOTHING about the law in school. We memorize obscure facts and
phrases here and there, like the Preamble, which says, 'We the
People…establish this Constitution for the United States of America.' But our
teachers only gloss over the Bill of Rights. Our schools (controlled by the
corporate government) don't delve into the Constitution at depth. After all, the
corporation was established to indoctrinate and 'dumb-down' the masses, not to
teach anything of value or importance. Certainly, no one mentioned that
America was sold-out to foreign interests, that we were beneficiaries of the debt
incurred by Congress, or that we were in debt to the international bankers. Yet,
for generations, Americans have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to
pay a massive debt that they did not incur. There's an endless stream of things
the People aren't told. And, now that you are being told, how do you feel about
being made the recipient of a debt without your knowledge or consent? "After
passage of the Act of 1871 Congress set a series of subtle and overt deceptions
into motion, deceptions in the form of decisions that were meant to sell us down
the river. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin until it was knocked down
and counted out by a technical KO [knock out]. With the surrender of the
people's gold in 1933, the 'common herd' was handed over to illegitimate law.
file:///C|/Documents and Settings/Byron Wine/Desktop/Act of 1871.htm (3 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
(I'll bet you weren't taught THAT in school.)
"Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty,
or Maritime, Law, which is also known as the 'Divine Right of Kings' and the
'Law of the Seas' -- another fact of American history not taught in our schools.
Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before our nation
began, and then became managed by private international law. In other words,
the government -- the government created for the District of Columbia via the
Act of 1871 – operates solely under Private International Law, not Common
Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic. "This fact has
impacted all Americans in concrete ways. For instance, although Private
International Law is technically only applicable within the District of Columbia,
and NOT in the other states of the Union, the arms of the Corporation of the
UNITED STATES are called 'departments' -- i.e., the Justice Department, the
Treasury Department. And those departments affect everyone, no matter where
(in what state) they live. Guess what? Each department belongs to the
corporation -- to the UNITED STATES.
"Refer to any UNITED STATES CODE (USC). Note the capitalization; this is
evidence of a corporation, not a Republic. For example, In Title 28 3002 (15)
(A) (B) (C), it is unequivocally stated that the UNITED STATES is a corporation.
Translation: the corporation is NOT a separate and distinct entity; it is not
disconnected from the government; it IS the government -- your government.
This is extremely important! I refer to it as the 'corporate EMPIRE of the UNITED
STATES,' which operates under Roman Civil Law outside the original
Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a corporation? You say you'll ask
your Congressperson about this? HA!! "Congress is fully aware of this deception.
So it's time that you, too, become aware of the deception. What this great
deception means is that the members of Congress do NOT work for us, for you
and me. They work for the Corporation, for the UNITED STATES. No wonder we
can't get them to do anything on our behalf, or meet or demands, or answer our
questions.
"Technically, legally, or any other way you want to look at the matter, the
corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in
ANY State of the Union (the Republic) beyond the District of Columbia. Let that
tidbit sink in, then ask yourself, could this deception have occurred without full
knowledge and complicity of the Congress? Do you think it happened by
accident? If you do, you're deceiving yourself.
"There are no accidents, no coincidences. Face the facts and confront the truth.
Remember, you are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the
law or, for that matter, your history. Why? Because no concerted effort was
ever made to teach or otherwise inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to
full disclosure of all facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than
what the corporation decides to 'give' you.
"Remember also that 'Ignorance of the law is no excuse.' It's your responsibility
and obligation to learn the law and know how it applies to you. No wonder the
file:///C|/Documents and Settings/Byron Wine/Desktop/Act of 1871.htm (4 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
corporation counted on the fact that most people are too indifferent,
unconcerned, distracted, or lazy to learn what they need to know to survive
within the system. We have been conditioned to let the government do our
thinking for us. Now's the time to turn that around if we intend to help save our
Republic and ourselves -- before it's too late.
"As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you
from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your property,
even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes, fines, and
licenses you have paid for or purchased. Yes, they had you by the pockets. If
you don't believe it, read the 14th Amendment. See how 'free' you really are.
Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as consent;
consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur. As a Sovereign People
we have been deceived for hundreds of years; we think we are free, but in truth
we are servants of the corporation.
"Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest men could
have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren't enough
honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more freedom
than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called
'government.' "Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars
would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person
would have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain
silent? How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we
stand together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been
as stolen from the us?
"If the People of America had known to what extent their trust was betrayed,
how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What we now need
is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking, then we can
change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy -- the liberty our
ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free People."
[Posted 8/27/02, www.babelmagazine.com/]
Wisdom And Freedom produced by WORLD NEWSSTAND
Copyright © 2003. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
page image by Windy's Design Studio
|
